Blog

  • Synology Reverses Third-Party HDD Ban Amid Slumping NAS Sales

    Synology Reverses Third-Party HDD Ban Amid Slumping NAS Sales

    Synology Reverses Policy Banning Third-Party HDDs After NAS Sales Plummet

    In a significant shift that has captured the attention of tech enthusiasts and NAS users alike, Synology has reversed its controversial policy restricting third-party hard drives. This decision comes on the heels of disappointing sales figures for their network-attached storage (NAS) devices in 2025, prompting the company to prioritize user satisfaction and flexibility.

    Background: A Policy That Backfired

    Earlier this year, Synology introduced a policy that effectively forced users to purchase only their proprietary hard drives, making third-party options from well-known brands such as Seagate and Western Digital (WD) nearly unusable on recent NAS models, including the DS925+, DS1825+, and DS425+. This strategic move was met with immediate backlash from users who vocalized their concerns over increased expenses and limited choices.

    Sales Impact: A Wake-Up Call

    The consequences of this decision were swift and severe. Reports indicated a sharp decline in sales of Synology’s 2025 NAS models following the introduction of the drive restrictions. Many users chose to forgo upgrades in protest, while industry reviewers criticized the company for what they deemed a greedy and short-sighted policy.

    A Fresh Start with DSM 7.3

    With the recent release of DSM 7.3, Synology has taken a significant step toward rectifying the situation. The company has now lifted the restrictions on third-party hard drives and 2.5-inch SATA SSDs, allowing users to utilize these drives without the hindrances of warning messages or limited functionality. Drives from Seagate, WD, and other brands are once again fully operational, complete with all essential monitoring and alert features.

    Community Response: Is It Enough?

    This reversal restores a level of freedom that many users appreciated, providing more options and lower costs when upgrading or building NAS systems. However, critics argue that this entire episode may have tarnished Synology’s reputation irreparably. The company’s attempt to tighten market control, especially amidst QNAP’s well-publicized ransomware issues, backfired, resulting in a loss of trust among its loyal customer base.

    Looking Ahead: Regaining Trust

    While the reinstatement of open drive support is undoubtedly good news for existing Synology users, it remains to be seen how effective this reversal will be in winning back frustrated customers. For now, DSM 7.3 signals a welcome return to the flexibility that initially made Synology a preferred choice in the NAS market.

    Synology NAS

    Source: Synology / nascompares

  • Trump’s DOE proposes cutting billions in grants for GM, Ford, and lots of startups

    Trump’s DOE proposes cutting billions in grants for GM, Ford, and lots of startups

    Proposed Department of Energy Cuts Could Impact Automakers and Startups

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is considering cutting more than $500 million in federal grants awarded to various startups and major automakers, a move that could significantly affect industry innovation and job growth. These potential cuts are part of broader actions initiated by the Trump administration, which have already included over $7.5 billion in contract reductions.

    According to a TechCrunch analysis of an unreleased internal document, automakers including Ford, General Motors, Stellantis, and Daimler Trucks North America stand to lose substantial funding designated for projects under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. General Motors, for instance, may face a loss of at least $500 million intended for retooling its Lansing Grand River Assembly Plant in Michigan to produce electrified vehicles.

    Startups also face significant repercussions. Noteworthy among them is Brimstone, which was awarded $189 million to establish a plant for producing low-carbon construction materials. Another affected company, Anovion, is aiming to develop a factory to produce synthetic graphite for lithium-ion batteries—an area currently dominated by Chinese production.

    The potential reductions extend beyond these companies, affecting various other enterprises in the construction and renewable energy sectors. Li Industries could lose $55.2 million aimed at recycling lithium iron phosphate batteries, while sublime Systems and Furno, focused on ultra-low-carbon cement solutions, might also see their grants cut.

    At least one proposed cancellation—targeting TS Conductor, which manufactures advanced electrical conductors—contradicts the administration’s objectives to enhance energy infrastructure and artificial intelligence capabilities.

    As these developments unfold, TechCrunch will provide updates from the affected companies regarding their responses to the proposed funding cuts. The implications of these decisions could reshape the landscape of U.S. manufacturing and renewable energy initiatives.

  • Revolut aims to take on Indian banks and their ‘criminal’ forex fees

    Revolut aims to take on Indian banks and their ‘criminal’ forex fees

    Revolut, a British fintech, is launching in India to tackle the underserved cross-border payments market. Indians spend around $30 billion abroad annually, losing nearly $600 million in bank fees. CEO Paroma Chatterjee aims to disrupt traditional banks by acquiring Arvog Forex and obtaining regulatory licenses. The service includes prepaid wallets with UPI support, a domestic Visa card, and children’s accounts, targeting 150 million digitally savvy Indians. Unlike competitors, Revolut requires full KYC checks, aiming for engaged users rather than just high numbers. With $45 million invested, the company faces competition from existing Indian fintechs but boasts a significant waitlist of 350,000.

    Source link By DevZam

  • Hello world!

    Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!